(no subject)

Date: 2007-11-20 10:43 pm (UTC)
nameandnature: (jc)
This line of attack works better for Christians who quite happily pick and choose which bits of the Torah apply to them and which don't.

If they want to claim to be Bible-believing Christians, they can do this with some Biblical justification: the Council of Jerusalem recorded in Acts 15 gives Gentile Christians a lot of latitude, but does prohibit sexual immorality (or "fornication" as the KJV puts it). So Christians could argue that the Torah's prohibitions on homosexuality were part of the sexual immorality rules while still eating pork without inconsistency (but not while eating black pudding, I hope you noticed). In the NT, Paul's letters have their own passages which can be taken to prohibit at least some forms of homosexuality, but like the OT passages, there are arguments about the cultural context.

My water-tight justification for the claim God doesn't say that homosexuality isn't intrinsically immoral is that God isn't real. This shortcuts a lot of arguments about what we can and cannot justify from the scriptures, I find.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

lavendersparkle: Jewish rat (Default)
lavendersparkle

July 2015

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19 202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags