(no subject)

[lavendersparkle]

Why exactly is Radio 4 allowing people on it's programmes who don't just believe in but have actively participated making education and employment conditional upon stripping for real women and talking to him as if he's a normal rational human being rather than a racist shit bag?

I have one thing to say to all the people who very calmly intellectually discuss how they have a lot of sympathy for the French policies which would exclude me and my children from education and almost every job I've ever held:
Fuck you!

Comments

[wildeabandon.livejournal.com]

I can't off the top of my head think of a better reason for "we like everyone to have a uniform appearance" than I can for "we like potential adoptive parents to fit the socially conventional model of a family"

Speaking as a queer, recently Christian, agnostic atheist, I didn't have any more choice about believing in God than I do about fancying all genders. If anything choosing not to do what I thought God wanted me to do would be harder than choosing not to do what I wanted to do, no matter how hot girls are.

In the French case, the rule makers explicitly wanted a secular system, for what at they consider good reasons

Well yes, and people wanted segregation and prop 8 and to prevent women's sufferage for what they considered good reasons.

Should we give them a platform for their views too?